Formula 1 on Edge: Mercedes Engine Dispute Pushes FIA Toward a Resolution
Before the 2026 regulations have even been implemented on track, Formula 1 finds itself in the midst of a major technical controversy. Concerns surrounding Mercedes’ next-generation power unit have escalated after Honda, Ferrari, and Audi formally approached the FIA, questioning whether the German manufacturer’s solution complies with the rules.
According to rival manufacturers, Mercedes’ engine meets the mandated 16:1 compression ratio during FIA inspections when the unit is cold. However, once the engine reaches operating temperature, it is alleged that the effective compression ratio rises to around 18:1. This raises the possibility of a system that passes static checks but behaves differently under real racing conditions.
So far, Mercedes has remained silent publicly, reportedly confident that its design fully complies with the FIA’s defined measurement procedures. Competitors, however, argue that the concept violates Article 1.5 of the Technical Regulations, which states that cars must be compliant at all times throughout a race weekend. At the heart of the debate lies a fundamental question: even if a solution passes inspections, does it breach the spirit of the rules?
The risk of this issue turning into a formal protest at the Australian Grand Prix adds urgency to the situation. In such a scenario, not only Mercedes but also customer teams McLaren, Williams, and Alpine could face the threat of exclusion. Starting a new regulatory era with such a high-profile dispute would pose a serious image problem for Formula 1.
For this reason, the matter was brought to the table before Christmas, giving Mercedes time to propose a remedy. Paddock speculation suggests the most likely fix involves a minor revision to the piston crown. This adjustment would aim to keep the combustion chamber volume within legal limits even at higher temperatures, though it may come at the cost of a small power loss. Meanwhile, claims that the system delivers a 15-horsepower gain are widely regarded by some as exaggerated.
The fact that rival teams are so well informed about the solution is believed to stem from recent engineering transfers. Several staff members have moved from Mercedes’ Brixworth engine division to other manufacturers, most notably Red Bull Powertrains, bringing knowledge of the concept with them. There are even suggestions that Red Bull has drawn inspiration from Mercedes’ approach while developing its own power unit.
More recently, the focus of the debate appears to have shifted. Metal expansion and the use of specialized materials are well-known practices in Formula 1 engine design and hardly controversial. Instead, insiders suggest the real issue lies in a geometric solution that operates independently of temperature changes, creating a grey area within the regulations.
Attention is now firmly on FIA technical director Jo Bauer and his team. The most probable outcome is a compromise between the parties. One option under discussion is for Mercedes and Red Bull Powertrains to slightly lower the compression ratio during cold measurements, ensuring compliance even under hot running conditions.
Should Mercedes refuse to compromise, however, the situation could escalate into a prolonged and aggressive legal battle. Such a development would not only intensify the current dispute but could also encourage other manufacturers to pursue increasingly aggressive interpretations of the rules. Even before the 2026 season begins, Formula 1’s new era is already being shaped by a looming technical power struggle.